1 00:00:06,630 --> 00:00:05,349 hi i'm trent perato public affairs 2 00:00:08,390 --> 00:00:06,640 officer at nasa headquarters in 3 00:00:09,990 --> 00:00:08,400 washington i'd like to welcome you to 4 00:00:11,830 --> 00:00:10,000 today's news conference to discuss the 5 00:00:14,150 --> 00:00:11,840 first results of the alpha magnetic 6 00:00:15,910 --> 00:00:14,160 spectrometer experiment ams is a 7 00:00:18,630 --> 00:00:15,920 state-of-the-art cosmic ray particle 8 00:00:20,870 --> 00:00:18,640 physics detector located on the exterior 9 00:00:22,710 --> 00:00:20,880 of the international space station for 10 00:00:24,870 --> 00:00:22,720 those joining us online you can find out 11 00:00:26,470 --> 00:00:24,880 more information about ams in the 12 00:00:29,509 --> 00:00:26,480 international space station at 13 00:00:32,790 --> 00:00:31,109 slash station 14 00:00:34,870 --> 00:00:32,800 as for the order of events today we have 15 00:00:36,549 --> 00:00:34,880 four speakers joining us each will 16 00:00:38,630 --> 00:00:36,559 provide brief remarks and then we'll 17 00:00:40,549 --> 00:00:38,640 open the floor and phone lines for 18 00:00:41,910 --> 00:00:40,559 questions and answers i'd like to take a 19 00:00:43,910 --> 00:00:41,920 brief moment to just welcome and 20 00:00:46,150 --> 00:00:43,920 introduce the speakers here in 21 00:00:48,310 --> 00:00:46,160 washington we have william gerstenmaier 22 00:00:51,350 --> 00:00:48,320 nasa associate administrator for human 23 00:00:53,750 --> 00:00:51,360 exploration and operations 24 00:00:56,229 --> 00:00:53,760 here also we have michael solomon 25 00:00:59,349 --> 00:00:56,239 program manager for ams at the u.s 26 00:01:02,069 --> 00:00:59,359 department of energy's office of science 27 00:01:03,189 --> 00:01:02,079 and mark cistelli nasa's ams program 28 00:01:05,189 --> 00:01:03,199 manager 29 00:01:06,950 --> 00:01:05,199 now joining us by video link from the 30 00:01:09,429 --> 00:01:06,960 european organization for nuclear 31 00:01:11,590 --> 00:01:09,439 research or cern in geneva switzerland 32 00:01:13,350 --> 00:01:11,600 is ams principal investigator and nobel 33 00:01:16,070 --> 00:01:13,360 laureate samuel ting of the 34 00:01:18,469 --> 00:01:16,080 massachusetts institute of technology 35 00:01:20,390 --> 00:01:18,479 and with that we'll have opening remarks 36 00:01:22,630 --> 00:01:20,400 and i'll hand the discussion over to mr 37 00:01:24,230 --> 00:01:22,640 gerstenmaier bill 38 00:01:28,469 --> 00:01:24,240 thank you trent it's 39 00:01:30,950 --> 00:01:28,479 my honor and privilege to be here today 40 00:01:32,469 --> 00:01:30,960 some days that my job is really great 41 00:01:34,230 --> 00:01:32,479 and this is one of those days when my 42 00:01:36,950 --> 00:01:34,240 job is really great and the reason it's 43 00:01:39,350 --> 00:01:36,960 great is i get to to recognize a team 44 00:01:41,990 --> 00:01:39,360 that has put many many years of hard 45 00:01:44,550 --> 00:01:42,000 work into an activity and they finally 46 00:01:46,230 --> 00:01:44,560 get to see the fruits of all that labor 47 00:01:48,789 --> 00:01:46,240 all those hours of putting this 48 00:01:51,350 --> 00:01:48,799 instrument together to actually see it 49 00:01:52,870 --> 00:01:51,360 come together to get good results and 50 00:01:54,469 --> 00:01:52,880 not just first light but to actually 51 00:01:56,469 --> 00:01:54,479 have the first paper published and to 52 00:01:58,789 --> 00:01:56,479 have that discussion occur today and 53 00:01:59,990 --> 00:01:58,799 cern with professor ting so 54 00:02:01,749 --> 00:02:00,000 i'm so 55 00:02:03,749 --> 00:02:01,759 happy to be here with this group that i 56 00:02:05,590 --> 00:02:03,759 know how much dedication how much work 57 00:02:07,109 --> 00:02:05,600 they've put into this effort and to see 58 00:02:09,270 --> 00:02:07,119 this wonderful instrument yield the 59 00:02:11,830 --> 00:02:09,280 results that professor ting talked about 60 00:02:13,830 --> 00:02:11,840 earlier today is just outstanding 61 00:02:16,309 --> 00:02:13,840 i look at this as maybe the first of 62 00:02:17,910 --> 00:02:16,319 many of these events i think the data 63 00:02:20,630 --> 00:02:17,920 that he shows today and the data he 64 00:02:22,070 --> 00:02:20,640 talked about today is is intriguing is 65 00:02:23,510 --> 00:02:22,080 very interesting there'll be more 66 00:02:25,589 --> 00:02:23,520 discussions on it from those that can 67 00:02:27,510 --> 00:02:25,599 describe it better than i can but i 68 00:02:28,790 --> 00:02:27,520 think it's just kind of the beginning of 69 00:02:31,350 --> 00:02:28,800 other great things that will come from 70 00:02:33,509 --> 00:02:31,360 this instrument onboard space station 71 00:02:35,030 --> 00:02:33,519 space station is a really nice platform 72 00:02:37,190 --> 00:02:35,040 well suited for this instrument it 73 00:02:38,949 --> 00:02:37,200 allows for a long long duration of 74 00:02:40,150 --> 00:02:38,959 observation time which is important to 75 00:02:42,790 --> 00:02:40,160 this instrument 76 00:02:44,550 --> 00:02:42,800 we can essentially use decades of 77 00:02:46,869 --> 00:02:44,560 observation time which will help reduce 78 00:02:48,790 --> 00:02:46,879 the statistics and certain low frequency 79 00:02:50,790 --> 00:02:48,800 events and station is a great platform 80 00:02:53,110 --> 00:02:50,800 for that so the station is a good 81 00:02:54,869 --> 00:02:53,120 platform this is a good 82 00:02:55,910 --> 00:02:54,879 a good indication of some of the results 83 00:02:58,070 --> 00:02:55,920 that are going to come from space 84 00:03:00,949 --> 00:02:58,080 station in the future so i'm again very 85 00:03:02,949 --> 00:03:00,959 excited to be here so again i'd like to 86 00:03:04,070 --> 00:03:02,959 thank sam and his team for all the work 87 00:03:05,670 --> 00:03:04,080 they've done for this truly 88 00:03:07,990 --> 00:03:05,680 international team that has brought 89 00:03:09,910 --> 00:03:08,000 these first results to us today i'd also 90 00:03:11,670 --> 00:03:09,920 like to take a special chance to thank 91 00:03:13,990 --> 00:03:11,680 doe for their involvement and their 92 00:03:15,670 --> 00:03:14,000 support of this activity without them 93 00:03:17,670 --> 00:03:15,680 this instrument would not be on orbit 94 00:03:19,509 --> 00:03:17,680 today so they hung through a lot of 95 00:03:21,509 --> 00:03:19,519 tough times with us they worked through 96 00:03:24,550 --> 00:03:21,519 a lot of integration issues with us and 97 00:03:26,229 --> 00:03:24,560 doe was a tremendous supporter of this 98 00:03:29,030 --> 00:03:26,239 activity all the way to where we are 99 00:03:31,030 --> 00:03:29,040 today so congratulations to them as well 100 00:03:33,430 --> 00:03:31,040 as the ams team so with that i'll 101 00:03:35,430 --> 00:03:33,440 conclude my remarks and and turn it over 102 00:03:36,789 --> 00:03:35,440 to the next speaker great thank you very 103 00:03:38,470 --> 00:03:36,799 much i understand we're having just a 104 00:03:40,470 --> 00:03:38,480 bit of technical difficulty in our 105 00:03:42,869 --> 00:03:40,480 connection to geneva law so as we try to 106 00:03:45,430 --> 00:03:42,879 reset that let's go ahead and start with 107 00:03:47,030 --> 00:03:45,440 michael solomon uh for for a bit of 108 00:03:48,630 --> 00:03:47,040 information on some of the results that 109 00:03:51,110 --> 00:03:48,640 came out today before we hear from 110 00:03:53,830 --> 00:03:51,120 professor ting i'd just like to put the 111 00:03:56,149 --> 00:03:53,840 the issue of these exciting ams results 112 00:03:58,470 --> 00:03:56,159 which you'll hear about shortly into a 113 00:03:59,670 --> 00:03:58,480 larger context in our global search for 114 00:04:01,589 --> 00:03:59,680 dark matter 115 00:04:03,190 --> 00:04:01,599 as you know the question what is dark 116 00:04:05,589 --> 00:04:03,200 matter is considered to be one of the 117 00:04:07,270 --> 00:04:05,599 most important questions in physics our 118 00:04:09,190 --> 00:04:07,280 standard model of particle physics 119 00:04:11,429 --> 00:04:09,200 highly successful predicted the higgs 120 00:04:13,670 --> 00:04:11,439 boson which was recently discovered has 121 00:04:15,589 --> 00:04:13,680 no place for dark matter what that means 122 00:04:17,590 --> 00:04:15,599 is if we detect dark matter and learn 123 00:04:19,670 --> 00:04:17,600 something about its nature we'll have 124 00:04:22,629 --> 00:04:19,680 made a major impact to our understanding 125 00:04:24,710 --> 00:04:22,639 of physics and nature itself 126 00:04:25,909 --> 00:04:24,720 so what is dark matter and how do we 127 00:04:27,909 --> 00:04:25,919 detect it 128 00:04:30,390 --> 00:04:27,919 we know that we live in a sea of dark 129 00:04:32,629 --> 00:04:30,400 matter our galaxy is embedded in a huge 130 00:04:34,950 --> 00:04:32,639 roughly spherical halo of dark matter 131 00:04:36,790 --> 00:04:34,960 particles we know that dark matter 132 00:04:38,790 --> 00:04:36,800 interacts gravitationally that's how it 133 00:04:40,469 --> 00:04:38,800 was first detected but we also know 134 00:04:42,710 --> 00:04:40,479 apparently that it doesn't interact with 135 00:04:44,790 --> 00:04:42,720 light hence the term dark matter and it 136 00:04:47,110 --> 00:04:44,800 doesn't experience the strong or nuclear 137 00:04:49,749 --> 00:04:47,120 interaction so how does it interact with 138 00:04:51,670 --> 00:04:49,759 nature a class of models predicts that 139 00:04:53,830 --> 00:04:51,680 dark matter will interact with atomic 140 00:04:56,629 --> 00:04:53,840 matter in a manner very similar to the 141 00:04:58,469 --> 00:04:56,639 way neutrinos do which means every once 142 00:05:00,550 --> 00:04:58,479 in a while there will be a rare 143 00:05:02,469 --> 00:05:00,560 interaction with an atomic nucleus that 144 00:05:04,790 --> 00:05:02,479 we can detect 145 00:05:06,870 --> 00:05:04,800 how do we find dark matter well there 146 00:05:08,150 --> 00:05:06,880 are three complementary methods of 147 00:05:09,749 --> 00:05:08,160 detection 148 00:05:10,390 --> 00:05:09,759 and i want to mention the department of 149 00:05:12,150 --> 00:05:10,400 energy 150 00:05:15,110 --> 00:05:12,160 supports efforts in all three of these 151 00:05:17,590 --> 00:05:15,120 methods of detection one is to look in 152 00:05:19,510 --> 00:05:17,600 accelerators accelerator collisions at 153 00:05:20,790 --> 00:05:19,520 high energies produce a wide variety of 154 00:05:24,310 --> 00:05:20,800 particles 155 00:05:26,310 --> 00:05:24,320 relatives are produced in such 156 00:05:28,390 --> 00:05:26,320 collisions searches have been made for 157 00:05:30,629 --> 00:05:28,400 these they've not been found so 158 00:05:32,790 --> 00:05:30,639 accelerator experiments have not yet 159 00:05:35,189 --> 00:05:32,800 yielded any evidence for dark matter 160 00:05:37,430 --> 00:05:35,199 direct searches for dark matter we live 161 00:05:38,710 --> 00:05:37,440 in a sea of dark matter particles deep 162 00:05:40,790 --> 00:05:38,720 underground 163 00:05:42,950 --> 00:05:40,800 all over the world are many experiments 164 00:05:44,390 --> 00:05:42,960 searching for those interactions those 165 00:05:46,950 --> 00:05:44,400 rare interactions of dark matter 166 00:05:49,270 --> 00:05:46,960 particles with detectors 167 00:05:51,270 --> 00:05:49,280 if there are some interactions that are 168 00:05:53,670 --> 00:05:51,280 seen and there are several we can 169 00:05:55,029 --> 00:05:53,680 actually learn about the characteristics 170 00:05:56,150 --> 00:05:55,039 of dark matter 171 00:05:58,070 --> 00:05:56,160 to date 172 00:06:00,390 --> 00:05:58,080 underground direct searches for dark 173 00:06:02,309 --> 00:06:00,400 matter have yielded no conclusive 174 00:06:04,150 --> 00:06:02,319 results that leaves us with the third 175 00:06:06,070 --> 00:06:04,160 and final method for dark matter 176 00:06:08,790 --> 00:06:06,080 detection and that is through the 177 00:06:11,350 --> 00:06:08,800 indirect observation of the products of 178 00:06:13,590 --> 00:06:11,360 dark matters when they annihilate in 179 00:06:16,150 --> 00:06:13,600 interstellar space 180 00:06:17,830 --> 00:06:16,160 class of models makes this prediction 181 00:06:20,390 --> 00:06:17,840 that occasionally dark matter particles 182 00:06:23,510 --> 00:06:20,400 will annihilate each other and produce 183 00:06:26,710 --> 00:06:23,520 high energy photons gamma rays and high 184 00:06:28,070 --> 00:06:26,720 energy electrons and positrons 185 00:06:29,590 --> 00:06:28,080 there have been searches for all of 186 00:06:31,830 --> 00:06:29,600 these 187 00:06:33,990 --> 00:06:31,840 searches for gamma rays from the 188 00:06:36,309 --> 00:06:34,000 galactic center resulting from dark 189 00:06:38,469 --> 00:06:36,319 matter annihilations have been done with 190 00:06:40,469 --> 00:06:38,479 ground-based instruments and space 191 00:06:42,710 --> 00:06:40,479 space-based instruments such as the 192 00:06:45,110 --> 00:06:42,720 fermi gamma-ray space telescope which is 193 00:06:46,950 --> 00:06:45,120 also a doe nasa 194 00:06:49,110 --> 00:06:46,960 collaboration 195 00:06:52,070 --> 00:06:49,120 and nothing has been found that leaves 196 00:06:54,469 --> 00:06:52,080 us with positrons cosmic ray positrons 197 00:06:56,390 --> 00:06:54,479 there have been a number of experiments 198 00:06:58,230 --> 00:06:56,400 done balloon experiments and space 199 00:07:01,589 --> 00:06:58,240 experiments that have looked 200 00:07:04,390 --> 00:07:01,599 at the spectrum of cosmic ray positrons 201 00:07:05,830 --> 00:07:04,400 if there exists a new source of 202 00:07:07,830 --> 00:07:05,840 positrons such as through the 203 00:07:09,670 --> 00:07:07,840 annihilation of dark matter we would 204 00:07:12,390 --> 00:07:09,680 expect to see it in the fraction of 205 00:07:15,189 --> 00:07:12,400 cosmic ray positrons that we see and in 206 00:07:17,589 --> 00:07:15,199 fact such an increase has been observed 207 00:07:19,830 --> 00:07:17,599 first a couple decades ago by balloons 208 00:07:22,469 --> 00:07:19,840 more recently with the italian space 209 00:07:26,150 --> 00:07:22,479 satellite pamela and then more recently 210 00:07:29,909 --> 00:07:26,160 with the fermi gamma-ray space telescope 211 00:07:32,309 --> 00:07:29,919 ams has put its it has made a major 212 00:07:34,230 --> 00:07:32,319 impact on this final method of detection 213 00:07:36,150 --> 00:07:34,240 cosmic ray positrons 214 00:07:38,710 --> 00:07:36,160 these other experiments have in fact 215 00:07:40,070 --> 00:07:38,720 observed this type of increase that one 216 00:07:43,189 --> 00:07:40,080 would expect from dark matter 217 00:07:45,670 --> 00:07:43,199 annihilation what ams has done is made a 218 00:07:48,390 --> 00:07:45,680 high precision measurement of the 219 00:07:49,990 --> 00:07:48,400 spectrum and it's detected spectral 220 00:07:52,230 --> 00:07:50,000 features which 221 00:07:53,830 --> 00:07:52,240 perhaps in the future can provide us 222 00:07:56,469 --> 00:07:53,840 with additional information on the 223 00:07:59,189 --> 00:07:56,479 nature of this excess now i have to say 224 00:08:01,830 --> 00:07:59,199 it's very important to say there may be 225 00:08:04,070 --> 00:08:01,840 a very common prosaic explanation for 226 00:08:06,230 --> 00:08:04,080 this excess it could be due to pulsars 227 00:08:09,110 --> 00:08:06,240 for example we don't know 228 00:08:11,510 --> 00:08:09,120 the fact is ams has made a high 229 00:08:13,189 --> 00:08:11,520 precision measurement and in the future 230 00:08:15,430 --> 00:08:13,199 with more statistics we're going to 231 00:08:17,270 --> 00:08:15,440 learn more about the nature of this 232 00:08:20,710 --> 00:08:17,280 excess and 233 00:08:25,990 --> 00:08:20,720 if nature is kind we might have a very 234 00:08:29,670 --> 00:08:27,510 thank you very much by the way excuse me 235 00:08:32,469 --> 00:08:29,680 i'm sorry i would like to take this 236 00:08:35,110 --> 00:08:32,479 opportunity to congratulate the ams 237 00:08:37,750 --> 00:08:35,120 international collaboration on 238 00:08:39,909 --> 00:08:37,760 producing a flawlessly performing 239 00:08:41,990 --> 00:08:39,919 experiment and i would also like to 240 00:08:42,790 --> 00:08:42,000 thank nasa for 241 00:08:43,990 --> 00:08:42,800 its 242 00:08:47,110 --> 00:08:44,000 superb 243 00:08:48,870 --> 00:08:47,120 uh performance in getting the ams onto 244 00:08:51,350 --> 00:08:48,880 the international space station and 245 00:08:53,430 --> 00:08:51,360 helping with the continued operations 246 00:08:54,710 --> 00:08:53,440 thank you great thank you mike uh we'll 247 00:08:57,350 --> 00:08:54,720 continue here in washington with our 248 00:09:06,829 --> 00:08:57,360 next speaker mark cistilli mark 249 00:09:11,269 --> 00:09:09,590 yeah okay i chose this image because 250 00:09:13,590 --> 00:09:11,279 this was taken roughly about two years 251 00:09:16,949 --> 00:09:13,600 ago when ams was first being stalled at 252 00:09:18,150 --> 00:09:16,959 that time uh it's fair to say that ams 253 00:09:20,470 --> 00:09:18,160 started a 254 00:09:23,910 --> 00:09:20,480 science voyage of exploration into our 255 00:09:25,750 --> 00:09:23,920 galaxy and beyond uh like all voyages of 256 00:09:27,030 --> 00:09:25,760 exploration we had our share of 257 00:09:28,550 --> 00:09:27,040 columbuses 258 00:09:30,710 --> 00:09:28,560 and i think it's only fair 259 00:09:33,590 --> 00:09:30,720 to acknowledge some of those uh 260 00:09:36,389 --> 00:09:33,600 both past and the few in the present 261 00:09:41,030 --> 00:09:36,399 going back some 19 years 262 00:09:44,070 --> 00:09:41,040 okay uh d we are people like wilmot hess 263 00:09:46,230 --> 00:09:44,080 john o'fallon had the scientific insight 264 00:09:48,949 --> 00:09:46,240 to select ams as a concept from 265 00:09:50,310 --> 00:09:48,959 professor ting in that same time frame 266 00:09:53,110 --> 00:09:50,320 roughly speaking former nasa 267 00:09:55,350 --> 00:09:53,120 administrator dan golden had the vision 268 00:09:57,910 --> 00:09:55,360 to see that ams was perfect for the 269 00:09:59,829 --> 00:09:57,920 space station 270 00:10:03,030 --> 00:09:59,839 at this time and in the past there are 271 00:10:04,870 --> 00:10:03,040 many very fine engineers at the nasa 272 00:10:07,750 --> 00:10:04,880 johnson space center 273 00:10:09,269 --> 00:10:07,760 trent martin ken bolwick 274 00:10:11,110 --> 00:10:09,279 chris tut 275 00:10:13,670 --> 00:10:11,120 tim urban phil mott 276 00:10:17,590 --> 00:10:13,680 many others okay whose tireless 277 00:10:19,910 --> 00:10:17,600 dedication over many many years made ams 278 00:10:23,190 --> 00:10:19,920 possible and was made possible the 279 00:10:26,470 --> 00:10:23,200 ability to take an experiment that prior 280 00:10:28,389 --> 00:10:26,480 was done in vast underground facilities 281 00:10:30,949 --> 00:10:28,399 okay and then be packaged and be able to 282 00:10:33,670 --> 00:10:30,959 put on the space station okay 283 00:10:35,910 --> 00:10:33,680 at the kennedy space center okay again 284 00:10:38,470 --> 00:10:35,920 many fine engineers that worked for many 285 00:10:39,829 --> 00:10:38,480 many months to take the ams and it's 286 00:10:41,670 --> 00:10:39,839 very unique center for handling 287 00:10:43,030 --> 00:10:41,680 requirements and prepared for the space 288 00:10:44,310 --> 00:10:43,040 shuttle ride 289 00:10:46,230 --> 00:10:44,320 at the marshall 290 00:10:49,350 --> 00:10:46,240 space flight center right now as we 291 00:10:51,750 --> 00:10:49,360 speak a team of dedicated engineers are 292 00:10:53,509 --> 00:10:51,760 working to keep ams operational and 293 00:10:56,949 --> 00:10:53,519 coordinate the ams 294 00:10:58,230 --> 00:10:56,959 with the control center at the cern 295 00:11:00,470 --> 00:10:58,240 and 296 00:11:02,069 --> 00:11:00,480 we can all take pride 297 00:11:04,470 --> 00:11:02,079 in what they are doing 298 00:11:05,990 --> 00:11:04,480 and as michael said a moment ago we're 299 00:11:08,630 --> 00:11:06,000 looking essentially at a glimpse of the 300 00:11:10,710 --> 00:11:08,640 future here and make no mistake about it 301 00:11:12,069 --> 00:11:10,720 there will be other glimpses from ams in 302 00:11:14,470 --> 00:11:12,079 the future to come 303 00:11:16,949 --> 00:11:14,480 this is a long-term program suited for a 304 00:11:18,949 --> 00:11:16,959 long-term vehicle the space station this 305 00:11:20,389 --> 00:11:18,959 is what station was built for and 306 00:11:22,150 --> 00:11:20,399 essentially amos is going to essentially 307 00:11:23,750 --> 00:11:22,160 carry through this 308 00:11:25,110 --> 00:11:23,760 i have no more 309 00:11:26,870 --> 00:11:25,120 great thank you very much and i am 310 00:11:28,949 --> 00:11:26,880 pleased to say we have a connection with 311 00:11:33,990 --> 00:11:28,959 cern in geneva so let's go there for 312 00:11:34,000 --> 00:11:38,710 good afternoon 313 00:11:44,069 --> 00:11:41,430 ms took 18 years to 314 00:11:46,310 --> 00:11:44,079 16 years to build 315 00:11:50,470 --> 00:11:46,320 what is made possible 316 00:11:52,389 --> 00:11:50,480 is through the strong support of nasa 317 00:11:54,710 --> 00:11:52,399 particularly 318 00:11:57,190 --> 00:11:54,720 then golding 319 00:11:59,430 --> 00:11:57,200 your guest gaston 320 00:12:01,910 --> 00:11:59,440 george abbey 321 00:12:03,430 --> 00:12:01,920 and many many others 322 00:12:06,230 --> 00:12:03,440 also from the 323 00:12:08,710 --> 00:12:06,240 department of energy 324 00:12:10,870 --> 00:12:08,720 office of for high energy physics 325 00:12:13,110 --> 00:12:10,880 jim secrets 326 00:12:14,790 --> 00:12:13,120 mike solomon 327 00:12:16,550 --> 00:12:14,800 dennis colvar 328 00:12:19,590 --> 00:12:16,560 and many others 329 00:12:21,509 --> 00:12:19,600 i swear us from mit from the school of 330 00:12:23,590 --> 00:12:21,519 science 331 00:12:25,190 --> 00:12:23,600 mark kessner and from the laboratory of 332 00:12:27,110 --> 00:12:25,200 nuclear science 333 00:12:28,389 --> 00:12:27,120 many many 334 00:12:29,910 --> 00:12:28,399 people 335 00:12:33,430 --> 00:12:29,920 work together 336 00:12:38,629 --> 00:12:36,710 physicists from germany 337 00:12:42,470 --> 00:12:38,639 under the leadership of 338 00:12:44,389 --> 00:12:42,480 professor cher professor lucas meyer 339 00:12:46,790 --> 00:12:44,399 from italy 340 00:12:48,550 --> 00:12:46,800 professor roberto battisto 341 00:12:50,870 --> 00:12:48,560 we did an enormous amount of work for 342 00:12:52,550 --> 00:12:50,880 ims 343 00:12:54,710 --> 00:12:52,560 from switzerland 344 00:12:59,110 --> 00:12:54,720 maurice spokane 345 00:13:00,949 --> 00:12:59,120 from spain my good friend manuel aguilar 346 00:13:02,470 --> 00:13:00,959 i'm from taiwan 347 00:13:04,870 --> 00:13:02,480 a.c lee 348 00:13:06,550 --> 00:13:04,880 and also from many universities 349 00:13:07,430 --> 00:13:06,560 in china 350 00:13:12,790 --> 00:13:07,440 in 351 00:13:16,310 --> 00:13:15,190 the observation 352 00:13:24,949 --> 00:13:16,320 of 353 00:13:24,959 --> 00:13:30,389 what ams has done what i reported today 354 00:13:39,269 --> 00:13:31,509 is 355 00:13:42,710 --> 00:13:39,279 good 356 00:13:46,389 --> 00:13:42,720 resolution and high statistics 357 00:13:48,710 --> 00:13:46,399 i've been as i said today in my talk 358 00:13:50,710 --> 00:13:48,720 i've been doing physics and accelerator 359 00:13:53,670 --> 00:13:50,720 for many many years 360 00:13:55,990 --> 00:13:53,680 uh the seldom 361 00:13:58,949 --> 00:13:56,000 anyone the accelerator to do a one 362 00:14:00,870 --> 00:13:58,959 percent experiment 363 00:14:02,389 --> 00:14:00,880 to do an experiment 364 00:14:04,310 --> 00:14:02,399 in space 365 00:14:07,030 --> 00:14:04,320 with a 366 00:14:09,110 --> 00:14:07,040 accuracy of one percent 367 00:14:11,350 --> 00:14:09,120 it's really quite difficult 368 00:14:13,269 --> 00:14:11,360 it's really made possible 369 00:14:15,189 --> 00:14:13,279 because of the existence of space 370 00:14:17,750 --> 00:14:15,199 station 371 00:14:20,230 --> 00:14:17,760 i'm because the support of nasa from 372 00:14:21,990 --> 00:14:20,240 cern i'm from the participating 373 00:14:24,230 --> 00:14:22,000 countries 374 00:14:26,790 --> 00:14:24,240 so 375 00:14:28,230 --> 00:14:26,800 this this is a very happy day for all of 376 00:14:30,470 --> 00:14:28,240 us 377 00:14:31,829 --> 00:14:30,480 as i mentioned before 378 00:14:35,110 --> 00:14:31,839 in my talk 379 00:14:39,110 --> 00:14:35,120 us we now discover many features 380 00:14:42,829 --> 00:14:39,120 of the of the rise of the spectrum 381 00:14:45,509 --> 00:14:42,839 in a short time the higher energy 382 00:14:47,990 --> 00:14:45,519 point how they behave 383 00:14:49,509 --> 00:14:48,000 how they drop off how quickly the drop 384 00:14:51,590 --> 00:14:49,519 pop 385 00:14:53,110 --> 00:14:51,600 will be 386 00:14:55,910 --> 00:14:53,120 revealed 387 00:14:57,750 --> 00:14:55,920 many people ask me lecture today why i 388 00:15:00,230 --> 00:14:57,760 don't announce it now 389 00:15:01,910 --> 00:15:00,240 and the answer is very simple 390 00:15:03,189 --> 00:15:01,920 i cannot control 391 00:15:06,389 --> 00:15:03,199 statistics 392 00:15:07,509 --> 00:15:06,399 it really depends on how long it took up 393 00:15:09,030 --> 00:15:07,519 to get 394 00:15:10,069 --> 00:15:09,040 enough events 395 00:15:13,430 --> 00:15:10,079 to make a 396 00:15:15,509 --> 00:15:13,440 definitive statement 397 00:15:17,910 --> 00:15:15,519 we of course 398 00:15:21,430 --> 00:15:17,920 at the same time 399 00:15:23,670 --> 00:15:21,440 measure many other things such as 400 00:15:25,350 --> 00:15:23,680 electron spectrum 401 00:15:27,030 --> 00:15:25,360 position spectrum 402 00:15:28,870 --> 00:15:27,040 proton spectrum 403 00:15:31,269 --> 00:15:28,880 helium spectrum 404 00:15:31,990 --> 00:15:31,279 nuclei spectrum 405 00:15:35,350 --> 00:15:32,000 so 406 00:15:38,790 --> 00:15:35,360 there will be enormous amount of data 407 00:15:39,670 --> 00:15:38,800 that's coming out very soon 408 00:15:42,470 --> 00:15:39,680 but 409 00:15:45,990 --> 00:15:42,480 i do want to take this opportunity 410 00:15:48,949 --> 00:15:46,000 to thank nasa again and particularly mr 411 00:15:54,870 --> 00:15:51,189 and 412 00:15:57,269 --> 00:15:54,880 turn martin marx stelli kim baldwin 413 00:16:00,870 --> 00:15:57,279 for make this possible 414 00:16:02,550 --> 00:16:00,880 so i'm happy to answer any questions 415 00:16:03,990 --> 00:16:02,560 great thank you very much dr ting so 416 00:16:05,430 --> 00:16:04,000 before we begin the q a just a quick 417 00:16:06,710 --> 00:16:05,440 reminder that you can find out more 418 00:16:09,069 --> 00:16:06,720 information about ams and the 419 00:16:11,829 --> 00:16:09,079 international space station at 420 00:16:13,350 --> 00:16:11,839 www.nasa.gov station you can find the 421 00:16:14,790 --> 00:16:13,360 ways to connect with us on social media 422 00:16:17,110 --> 00:16:14,800 and follow the conversation there at 423 00:16:18,790 --> 00:16:17,120 nasa.gov connect 424 00:16:20,230 --> 00:16:18,800 so we'll now move on to the question and 425 00:16:21,670 --> 00:16:20,240 answer session a quick reminder for 426 00:16:23,350 --> 00:16:21,680 those in the audience just please wait 427 00:16:24,470 --> 00:16:23,360 until we get a microphone to you please 428 00:16:26,629 --> 00:16:24,480 identify yourself in your media 429 00:16:27,829 --> 00:16:26,639 affiliation for those joining by phone 430 00:16:29,829 --> 00:16:27,839 you can signal the operator that you 431 00:16:31,829 --> 00:16:29,839 have a question by pushing the star one 432 00:16:33,829 --> 00:16:31,839 keys on your telephone and i understand 433 00:16:35,829 --> 00:16:33,839 we have our first question by phone from 434 00:16:38,550 --> 00:16:35,839 seth bornstein of the associated press 435 00:16:43,670 --> 00:16:40,389 yes thank you so much 436 00:16:46,870 --> 00:16:43,680 um this is for dr ting or maybe if if he 437 00:16:48,310 --> 00:16:46,880 can't er if there's an issue mr 438 00:16:50,150 --> 00:16:48,320 mr solomon 439 00:16:52,389 --> 00:16:50,160 i guess trying to compare the 440 00:16:53,590 --> 00:16:52,399 differences between these results and 441 00:16:57,910 --> 00:16:53,600 pamela 442 00:17:00,230 --> 00:16:57,920 and fermi is it fair i mean these aren't 443 00:17:02,069 --> 00:17:00,240 the first results obviously that show 444 00:17:04,870 --> 00:17:02,079 what would be the footprints of dark 445 00:17:06,870 --> 00:17:04,880 matter or a more prosaic 446 00:17:09,029 --> 00:17:06,880 answer are these 447 00:17:11,590 --> 00:17:09,039 i know they're more precise do they add 448 00:17:13,829 --> 00:17:11,600 more heft i mean why are these more 449 00:17:16,390 --> 00:17:13,839 important than the other ones are they 450 00:17:19,110 --> 00:17:16,400 more substantial more significant 451 00:17:20,710 --> 00:17:19,120 um i guess that's what i'm trying to get 452 00:17:22,549 --> 00:17:20,720 why is this 453 00:17:24,789 --> 00:17:22,559 better data than 454 00:17:26,230 --> 00:17:24,799 does this does this bolster the case for 455 00:17:28,710 --> 00:17:26,240 dark matter 456 00:17:33,190 --> 00:17:30,549 so i'll answer this question 457 00:17:34,950 --> 00:17:33,200 can you hear me 458 00:17:35,909 --> 00:17:34,960 yes yes i can 459 00:17:37,110 --> 00:17:35,919 yes 460 00:17:39,750 --> 00:17:37,120 uh 461 00:17:41,669 --> 00:17:39,760 i can only comment on ams experiment 462 00:17:45,669 --> 00:17:41,679 it has an accuracy 463 00:17:50,950 --> 00:17:45,679 for most of the data of one percent 464 00:17:58,390 --> 00:17:52,470 unmatched 465 00:17:58,400 --> 00:18:02,789 it is this fine feature 466 00:18:07,029 --> 00:18:05,029 set the difference 467 00:18:08,150 --> 00:18:07,039 between us and the rest of the 468 00:18:10,230 --> 00:18:08,160 experiment 469 00:18:12,150 --> 00:18:10,240 as i just mentioned 470 00:18:15,029 --> 00:18:12,160 just like you look at phenomena with 471 00:18:17,990 --> 00:18:15,039 your eye or with the electron microscope 472 00:18:20,549 --> 00:18:18,000 you see different things 473 00:18:25,029 --> 00:18:20,559 we see the spectrum increase 474 00:18:29,110 --> 00:18:27,190 this becomes slower and slower and 475 00:18:31,110 --> 00:18:29,120 slower 476 00:18:32,710 --> 00:18:31,120 when you increa when you move to higher 477 00:18:37,669 --> 00:18:32,720 energy 478 00:18:41,110 --> 00:18:39,029 the 479 00:18:43,750 --> 00:18:41,120 position 480 00:18:45,990 --> 00:18:43,760 to electron ratio 481 00:18:46,870 --> 00:18:46,000 is an isotropic 482 00:18:48,789 --> 00:18:46,880 it 483 00:18:51,430 --> 00:18:48,799 is isotropic 484 00:18:54,630 --> 00:18:51,440 meaning there's no fixed direction it 485 00:18:58,070 --> 00:18:57,190 these 486 00:19:00,549 --> 00:18:58,080 are 487 00:19:03,669 --> 00:19:00,559 some unique features 488 00:19:09,029 --> 00:19:03,679 in addition with us because we're so 489 00:19:11,590 --> 00:19:09,039 fine data we do not see any sharp peaks 490 00:19:14,789 --> 00:19:11,600 and we see the slope increases 491 00:19:16,950 --> 00:19:14,799 and seems to gradually 492 00:19:18,789 --> 00:19:16,960 flatten out 493 00:19:21,510 --> 00:19:18,799 with more data 494 00:19:24,870 --> 00:19:21,520 we will soon know 495 00:19:26,950 --> 00:19:24,880 when it drops off how quickly drop off 496 00:19:28,310 --> 00:19:26,960 and then we will know 497 00:19:29,110 --> 00:19:28,320 what we see 498 00:19:30,630 --> 00:19:29,120 is 499 00:19:32,549 --> 00:19:30,640 from 500 00:19:35,110 --> 00:19:32,559 dark matter collisions 501 00:19:37,190 --> 00:19:35,120 or from pulsars 502 00:19:42,470 --> 00:19:37,200 and this we should know which or 503 00:19:42,480 --> 00:19:46,950 okay anything to add here in washington 504 00:19:51,510 --> 00:19:49,669 um i i would just echo what sam said he 505 00:19:54,150 --> 00:19:51,520 said it very well 506 00:19:56,549 --> 00:19:54,160 what we're seeing with pamela and other 507 00:19:58,470 --> 00:19:56,559 instruments is a coarse 508 00:20:01,029 --> 00:19:58,480 measure of the spectrum 509 00:20:04,470 --> 00:20:01,039 a very clear increase in the positron 510 00:20:07,270 --> 00:20:04,480 fraction but the detail of the spectrum 511 00:20:09,270 --> 00:20:07,280 is what really provides us with 512 00:20:11,750 --> 00:20:09,280 valuable information and that's coming 513 00:20:13,350 --> 00:20:11,760 from the ams instrument 514 00:20:15,909 --> 00:20:13,360 we're learning more about the spectrum 515 00:20:17,029 --> 00:20:15,919 with ams 516 00:20:17,990 --> 00:20:17,039 let's go ahead and take one more from 517 00:20:19,669 --> 00:20:18,000 the phone bridge and then we'll come 518 00:20:22,789 --> 00:20:19,679 here to the audience at nasa 519 00:20:25,270 --> 00:20:22,799 headquarters next up alan boyle msnbc 520 00:20:30,470 --> 00:20:27,590 well thank you this is probably for dr 521 00:20:33,510 --> 00:20:30,480 king as well you mentioned uh the 522 00:20:36,070 --> 00:20:33,520 drop off that would be expected in the 523 00:20:38,149 --> 00:20:36,080 uh fraction of positrons and i don't 524 00:20:40,470 --> 00:20:38,159 think that that drop-off has been seen 525 00:20:43,350 --> 00:20:40,480 in the observations so far does that 526 00:20:46,070 --> 00:20:43,360 give you pause uh or do you feel as if 527 00:20:50,070 --> 00:20:46,080 it's just too early uh that the drop-off 528 00:20:55,110 --> 00:20:52,230 when i give the seminar today 529 00:20:58,230 --> 00:20:55,120 many people ask me what is the behavior 530 00:21:02,070 --> 00:20:58,240 of the next point and the point beyond 531 00:21:04,950 --> 00:21:02,080 and i said 532 00:21:07,590 --> 00:21:04,960 us many years to build this detector 533 00:21:10,070 --> 00:21:07,600 we want to publish your data 534 00:21:12,470 --> 00:21:10,080 when there are enough statistics 535 00:21:15,029 --> 00:21:12,480 and so when there's a drop-off 536 00:21:17,590 --> 00:21:15,039 there's no doubt it has dropped out and 537 00:21:18,310 --> 00:21:17,600 also we want to know how quickly drop 538 00:21:19,270 --> 00:21:18,320 off 539 00:21:24,470 --> 00:21:19,280 how 540 00:21:27,350 --> 00:21:24,480 the way it drops off 541 00:21:28,710 --> 00:21:27,360 that tells you whether it's dark matter 542 00:21:32,149 --> 00:21:28,720 collision 543 00:21:35,510 --> 00:21:32,159 or from puzzles and this we should know 544 00:21:38,710 --> 00:21:37,029 good any uh anything to add here in 545 00:21:40,470 --> 00:21:38,720 washington 546 00:21:42,230 --> 00:21:40,480 okay let's go here in the audience our 547 00:21:44,789 --> 00:21:42,240 question 548 00:21:47,270 --> 00:21:44,799 hi i'm miriam cramer i'm with space.com 549 00:21:49,750 --> 00:21:47,280 um and i'm just wondering uh so i know 550 00:21:52,390 --> 00:21:49,760 that the ams was actually canceled i 551 00:21:53,510 --> 00:21:52,400 think in um in 2005 before it ended up 552 00:21:55,350 --> 00:21:53,520 going on 553 00:21:57,590 --> 00:21:55,360 up on the last 554 00:21:59,590 --> 00:21:57,600 endeavor shuttle launch and i'm just 555 00:22:00,789 --> 00:21:59,600 curious um and this is for anybody who'd 556 00:22:02,549 --> 00:22:00,799 like to answer it 557 00:22:05,110 --> 00:22:02,559 sort of what does that mean either to 558 00:22:12,070 --> 00:22:05,120 you personally or sort of to the agency 559 00:22:16,789 --> 00:22:15,190 like i can just say that 560 00:22:21,270 --> 00:22:16,799 i don't know i guess it teaches us 561 00:22:25,029 --> 00:22:23,270 there were times when we were uncertain 562 00:22:26,789 --> 00:22:25,039 about exactly what the future was going 563 00:22:29,029 --> 00:22:26,799 to be 564 00:22:30,870 --> 00:22:29,039 we knew the quality of science was was 565 00:22:32,710 --> 00:22:30,880 pretty strong and was pretty important 566 00:22:35,669 --> 00:22:32,720 and the team hung in there as i 567 00:22:37,990 --> 00:22:35,679 described earlier and kept kind of 568 00:22:39,590 --> 00:22:38,000 pursuing their passion their dreams and 569 00:22:41,990 --> 00:22:39,600 pretty uncertain and turbulent 570 00:22:45,909 --> 00:22:42,000 circumstances and but they kept moving 571 00:22:47,270 --> 00:22:45,919 forward all the teams and and eventually 572 00:22:48,789 --> 00:22:47,280 things worked out and we got the 573 00:22:50,310 --> 00:22:48,799 instrument on orbit and you get to see 574 00:22:52,549 --> 00:22:50,320 the results today so i think there's 575 00:22:54,390 --> 00:22:52,559 probably a message to all of us when it 576 00:22:56,789 --> 00:22:54,400 looks kind of dark and doesn't look like 577 00:22:57,590 --> 00:22:56,799 there's a clear path forward 578 00:22:59,750 --> 00:22:57,600 you know 579 00:23:02,070 --> 00:22:59,760 fix your eyes on that point out in the 580 00:23:04,230 --> 00:23:02,080 future and continue moving forward and 581 00:23:05,590 --> 00:23:04,240 keep following your passion and maybe 582 00:23:07,190 --> 00:23:05,600 things will break the right way and 583 00:23:08,630 --> 00:23:07,200 you'll get to see the results in the end 584 00:23:09,990 --> 00:23:08,640 and then maybe they're just a tad 585 00:23:10,950 --> 00:23:10,000 sweeter that way than they would have 586 00:23:15,190 --> 00:23:10,960 been 587 00:23:17,430 --> 00:23:15,200 turbulent uh path to the to the results 588 00:23:19,029 --> 00:23:17,440 and i'd like to add that you know doi 589 00:23:22,950 --> 00:23:19,039 has been supporting this experiment 590 00:23:23,990 --> 00:23:22,960 since inception i guess in the mid 1990s 591 00:23:26,870 --> 00:23:24,000 and 592 00:23:28,630 --> 00:23:26,880 our our interaction with nasa has been 593 00:23:31,510 --> 00:23:28,640 uh fantastic there have been little 594 00:23:40,549 --> 00:23:31,520 glitches but the end product is here for 595 00:23:44,789 --> 00:23:42,470 yeah dr tank sound like dr ting wanted 596 00:23:48,149 --> 00:23:44,799 to add something yeah 597 00:23:53,430 --> 00:23:51,350 we were moving off we were moved off the 598 00:23:54,470 --> 00:23:53,440 manifest 599 00:23:56,950 --> 00:23:54,480 in 600 00:24:01,590 --> 00:23:56,960 october 601 00:24:05,830 --> 00:24:04,470 i made a mistake coming to nasa 602 00:24:08,149 --> 00:24:05,840 headquarters 603 00:24:10,870 --> 00:24:08,159 meet the administrator 604 00:24:14,870 --> 00:24:12,870 i guess i didn't do my presentation to 605 00:24:17,990 --> 00:24:14,880 where i was told your project is 606 00:24:22,710 --> 00:24:19,909 but 607 00:24:24,470 --> 00:24:22,720 even though it was cancelled 608 00:24:26,549 --> 00:24:24,480 doe 609 00:24:28,630 --> 00:24:26,559 continued 610 00:24:32,390 --> 00:24:28,640 support us 611 00:24:35,510 --> 00:24:32,400 in addition most importantly the spanish 612 00:24:36,789 --> 00:24:35,520 the germans the italians the swiss 613 00:24:39,990 --> 00:24:36,799 everybody 614 00:24:42,549 --> 00:24:40,000 believe the experiment is so important 615 00:24:44,230 --> 00:24:42,559 we are going to carry it out like mr 616 00:24:46,390 --> 00:24:44,240 gastermeyer said 617 00:24:49,350 --> 00:24:46,400 i also want to mention 618 00:24:51,029 --> 00:24:49,360 even when we were canceled we continued 619 00:24:53,350 --> 00:24:51,039 to receive support 620 00:24:56,390 --> 00:24:53,360 from mr gaster meyer and from johnson 621 00:24:58,950 --> 00:24:56,400 space center which what made it 622 00:25:00,789 --> 00:24:58,960 possible today 623 00:25:02,710 --> 00:25:00,799 great thank you very much let's go uh 624 00:25:07,190 --> 00:25:02,720 back to the phone line now with jeff 625 00:25:11,750 --> 00:25:09,110 hi there guys um 626 00:25:14,630 --> 00:25:11,760 my question is mainly for dr ting does 627 00:25:16,710 --> 00:25:14,640 he believe that he's seen the first 628 00:25:18,230 --> 00:25:16,720 signs of dark matter today 629 00:25:20,230 --> 00:25:18,240 and does he believe 630 00:25:22,230 --> 00:25:20,240 that ams will eventually be able to 631 00:25:26,390 --> 00:25:22,240 definitively show whether this was dark 632 00:25:31,990 --> 00:25:29,510 yes i can answer you 633 00:25:34,310 --> 00:25:32,000 what we have shown today 634 00:25:38,230 --> 00:25:34,320 only represents 635 00:25:39,269 --> 00:25:38,240 less than 10 of the data 636 00:25:40,630 --> 00:25:39,279 and so 637 00:25:42,390 --> 00:25:40,640 with a 638 00:25:43,750 --> 00:25:42,400 longer 639 00:25:45,590 --> 00:25:43,760 right 640 00:25:47,029 --> 00:25:45,600 data collection time 641 00:25:49,190 --> 00:25:47,039 eventually 642 00:25:52,470 --> 00:25:49,200 we will go to 643 00:25:53,430 --> 00:25:52,480 energy of trillion electron volt scale 644 00:25:55,430 --> 00:25:53,440 um 645 00:25:58,390 --> 00:25:55,440 i think 646 00:26:01,830 --> 00:25:58,400 with the ms there's no question 647 00:26:07,669 --> 00:26:01,840 we are going to solve this problem 648 00:26:11,909 --> 00:26:09,510 okay let's go back to the phone line 649 00:26:15,269 --> 00:26:11,919 again with caroline johnson of the 650 00:26:17,510 --> 00:26:15,279 boston globe caroline 651 00:26:19,110 --> 00:26:17,520 thanks for taking my question um i was 652 00:26:20,549 --> 00:26:19,120 wondering if doc 653 00:26:22,470 --> 00:26:20,559 could answer 654 00:26:25,990 --> 00:26:22,480 how much more data do you think you need 655 00:26:27,669 --> 00:26:26,000 how many more years or months 656 00:26:29,990 --> 00:26:27,679 of events 657 00:26:34,070 --> 00:26:30,000 is to detect definitively whether it's 658 00:26:36,149 --> 00:26:35,110 carolyn 659 00:26:40,549 --> 00:26:36,159 nice to 660 00:26:45,029 --> 00:26:42,070 we do not know 661 00:26:49,110 --> 00:26:45,039 because it really doesn't depend on us 662 00:26:51,909 --> 00:26:50,549 if 663 00:26:54,630 --> 00:26:51,919 there's a short 664 00:26:59,909 --> 00:26:54,640 sudden quick drop off 665 00:27:02,230 --> 00:26:59,919 of the spectrum this means we have found 666 00:27:04,710 --> 00:27:02,240 the origin of dark matter 667 00:27:07,669 --> 00:27:04,720 in which case we will like very few 668 00:27:08,390 --> 00:27:07,679 events because the spectrum will drop 669 00:27:10,310 --> 00:27:08,400 off 670 00:27:13,190 --> 00:27:10,320 very quickly 671 00:27:15,750 --> 00:27:13,200 if the excess compound pulsars then is 672 00:27:18,310 --> 00:27:15,760 going to drop up very slowly then we're 673 00:27:21,990 --> 00:27:18,320 going to collect quite a few more events 674 00:27:25,830 --> 00:27:22,000 at very high energies i think the next 675 00:27:28,789 --> 00:27:25,840 year or two we will know much better 676 00:27:30,310 --> 00:27:28,799 we have some information now of course 677 00:27:32,149 --> 00:27:30,320 but 678 00:27:34,389 --> 00:27:32,159 with 679 00:27:36,789 --> 00:27:34,399 not enough statistics 680 00:27:39,430 --> 00:27:36,799 it's probably better 681 00:27:40,549 --> 00:27:39,440 we do this carefully and systematically 682 00:27:43,350 --> 00:27:40,559 make sure 683 00:27:48,389 --> 00:27:43,360 what we announced is really correct it's 684 00:27:52,230 --> 00:27:50,230 okay our next question comes from mark 685 00:27:55,909 --> 00:27:52,240 matthews of the orlando sentinel go 686 00:28:00,549 --> 00:27:58,470 thanks guys i appreciate the question um 687 00:28:02,950 --> 00:28:00,559 this next question is for for anyone on 688 00:28:05,269 --> 00:28:02,960 the panel i was uh looking for someone 689 00:28:07,590 --> 00:28:05,279 to help explain the relationship here 690 00:28:09,669 --> 00:28:07,600 between the findings announced today 691 00:28:17,510 --> 00:28:09,679 and the presence of anti-matter in the 692 00:28:21,669 --> 00:28:19,590 i can answer that or professor tinkhan 693 00:28:25,830 --> 00:28:21,679 let me throw my head in first i don't 694 00:28:29,909 --> 00:28:28,549 okay dr ting 695 00:28:36,389 --> 00:28:29,919 i think uh 696 00:28:40,630 --> 00:28:38,789 okay our next question comes from monica 697 00:28:43,190 --> 00:28:40,640 young at sky and telescope magazine go 698 00:28:45,110 --> 00:28:43,200 ahead monica 699 00:28:47,350 --> 00:28:45,120 hi thanks for taking my question uh i'm 700 00:28:49,909 --> 00:28:47,360 wondering if you can speak spanx at this 701 00:28:51,430 --> 00:28:49,919 point on what mass range of 702 00:28:54,230 --> 00:28:51,440 better particles 703 00:29:00,149 --> 00:28:54,240 we would have and if those would be 704 00:29:03,430 --> 00:29:02,310 i couldn't hear the question i'm sorry 705 00:29:05,350 --> 00:29:03,440 would you mind repeating the question 706 00:29:07,510 --> 00:29:05,360 monica 707 00:29:16,389 --> 00:29:07,520 uh certainly yeah um i'm 708 00:29:20,230 --> 00:29:17,909 you're cutting out just a bit so try it 709 00:29:22,389 --> 00:29:20,240 try it one more time 710 00:29:25,590 --> 00:29:22,399 oh sorry about that um i'm wondering 711 00:29:28,310 --> 00:29:25,600 about fast rain or metaphorical if the 712 00:29:31,190 --> 00:29:28,320 observations are able to 713 00:29:33,269 --> 00:29:31,200 okay so the mass range of the particles 714 00:29:36,230 --> 00:29:33,279 is is the gist of the question if it's 715 00:29:38,389 --> 00:29:36,240 confirmed if it's confirmed 716 00:29:40,549 --> 00:29:38,399 we should be able to 717 00:29:45,350 --> 00:29:40,559 look to the mass range close to 1 718 00:29:48,630 --> 00:29:46,389 okay 719 00:29:50,950 --> 00:29:48,640 let's move on 720 00:29:52,070 --> 00:29:50,960 did you hear me yes we we copy your 721 00:29:54,630 --> 00:29:52,080 answer 722 00:29:58,470 --> 00:29:54,640 uh next is john uh heil prin from the 723 00:30:02,310 --> 00:29:59,350 thank you 724 00:30:04,310 --> 00:30:02,320 uh i'm wondering if the uh drop-off 725 00:30:10,549 --> 00:30:04,320 is more indicative of dark matter or 726 00:30:13,990 --> 00:30:11,590 we 727 00:30:16,310 --> 00:30:14,000 this moment 728 00:30:18,470 --> 00:30:16,320 have not decided 729 00:30:21,990 --> 00:30:18,480 how to phrase this 730 00:30:24,630 --> 00:30:22,000 because we don't have enough 731 00:30:29,590 --> 00:30:26,789 with time 732 00:30:32,470 --> 00:30:29,600 we should be able to tell you 733 00:30:34,230 --> 00:30:32,480 whether it's drop-off very quickly 734 00:30:35,510 --> 00:30:34,240 in which case would be dark matter 735 00:30:38,789 --> 00:30:35,520 collision 736 00:30:42,149 --> 00:30:38,799 means we have found dark matter 737 00:30:48,630 --> 00:30:42,159 or it will operate slowly which means 738 00:30:53,510 --> 00:30:51,510 okay anything to add here in washington 739 00:30:55,269 --> 00:30:53,520 okay uh let's go for one follow-up by 740 00:30:57,509 --> 00:30:55,279 seth bornstein associated press go ahead 741 00:30:59,909 --> 00:30:57,519 seth 742 00:31:01,190 --> 00:30:59,919 thank you uh dr ting i'm sorry to keep 743 00:31:04,470 --> 00:31:01,200 pushing 744 00:31:06,950 --> 00:31:04,480 uh but in terms of at the moment are you 745 00:31:08,950 --> 00:31:06,960 do you feel what you know now more 746 00:31:11,509 --> 00:31:08,960 bolsters the case 747 00:31:14,470 --> 00:31:11,519 that this is dark matter or does it more 748 00:31:17,190 --> 00:31:14,480 bolster the case that is 749 00:31:18,870 --> 00:31:17,200 ulsars i mean right now 750 00:31:21,190 --> 00:31:18,880 which are you more 751 00:31:24,950 --> 00:31:21,200 which does this help more which are you 752 00:31:30,630 --> 00:31:27,830 for experimental physicists 753 00:31:34,070 --> 00:31:30,640 it is extremely important 754 00:31:36,789 --> 00:31:34,080 not to have preconceived ideas 755 00:31:39,590 --> 00:31:36,799 and you analyze the data and see what 756 00:31:41,029 --> 00:31:39,600 you get that's right so 757 00:31:43,590 --> 00:31:41,039 better i 758 00:31:46,310 --> 00:31:43,600 do not have any preference because you 759 00:31:48,470 --> 00:31:46,320 have a preference you analyze your data 760 00:31:52,950 --> 00:31:48,480 according to your preference 761 00:31:55,990 --> 00:31:54,710 okay before we begin to wrap and take 762 00:31:57,269 --> 00:31:56,000 the last few questions by phone let me 763 00:31:58,470 --> 00:31:57,279 just do a quick check in the audience 764 00:32:01,110 --> 00:31:58,480 and and just see if we have any 765 00:32:03,110 --> 00:32:01,120 additional questions here 766 00:32:07,669 --> 00:32:03,120 seeing none let's go to matthew francis 767 00:32:11,669 --> 00:32:10,549 hi and thank you um my question has to 768 00:32:14,950 --> 00:32:11,679 do with 769 00:32:17,110 --> 00:32:14,960 the results from the uh the data are 770 00:32:19,830 --> 00:32:17,120 showing a remarkable amount of 771 00:32:22,549 --> 00:32:19,840 isotropy meaning that the flux of 772 00:32:24,630 --> 00:32:22,559 positrons is coming from all directions 773 00:32:27,430 --> 00:32:24,640 now correct me if i'm wrong but it seems 774 00:32:29,590 --> 00:32:27,440 to me that if these are truly from 775 00:32:32,230 --> 00:32:29,600 dark matter annihilation shouldn't there 776 00:32:33,990 --> 00:32:32,240 be strong anisotropy 777 00:32:36,149 --> 00:32:34,000 particularly from 778 00:32:42,470 --> 00:32:36,159 say central galactic region can you 779 00:32:47,830 --> 00:32:44,789 most of the people believe 780 00:32:49,350 --> 00:32:47,840 dark dark matter is distributed 781 00:32:51,269 --> 00:32:49,360 uniformly 782 00:32:53,669 --> 00:32:51,279 throughout the cosmos 783 00:32:56,389 --> 00:32:53,679 and therefore their collision 784 00:32:58,549 --> 00:32:56,399 will produce isotopic positive 785 00:33:00,789 --> 00:32:58,559 distributions 786 00:33:03,350 --> 00:33:00,799 pulsars on the other hand 787 00:33:04,389 --> 00:33:03,360 has a fixed direction 788 00:33:06,710 --> 00:33:04,399 and so 789 00:33:09,750 --> 00:33:06,720 it tends to 790 00:33:11,190 --> 00:33:09,760 give you positrons in a given direction 791 00:33:12,710 --> 00:33:11,200 and therefore 792 00:33:18,230 --> 00:33:12,720 would be 793 00:33:25,190 --> 00:33:20,230 okay our next question comes from todd 794 00:33:25,200 --> 00:33:28,710 thanks very much 795 00:33:28,720 --> 00:33:31,430 can you hear me 796 00:33:31,440 --> 00:33:35,110 yes i can hear you 797 00:33:38,789 --> 00:33:36,070 thanks 798 00:33:41,110 --> 00:33:38,799 i'm wondering uh just 799 00:33:42,950 --> 00:33:41,120 trying to boil this down are you 800 00:33:46,230 --> 00:33:42,960 recording today that you think you've 801 00:33:49,830 --> 00:33:46,240 seen the first evidence of dark matter 802 00:33:50,549 --> 00:33:49,840 and that you're confident that the ams 803 00:33:54,590 --> 00:33:50,559 will 804 00:33:57,509 --> 00:33:54,600 enable you to sort the issue out or 805 00:34:00,870 --> 00:33:57,519 definitively detect dark matter in the 806 00:34:06,950 --> 00:34:03,750 i said our evidence 807 00:34:10,230 --> 00:34:06,960 support the existence of dark matter but 808 00:34:12,790 --> 00:34:10,240 could not rule out 809 00:34:13,589 --> 00:34:12,800 the origin come from poland 810 00:34:15,990 --> 00:34:13,599 but 811 00:34:18,470 --> 00:34:16,000 i'm confident 812 00:34:20,310 --> 00:34:18,480 with enough time because we will be on 813 00:34:22,069 --> 00:34:20,320 the space station for the lifetime of 814 00:34:27,349 --> 00:34:22,079 the space station 815 00:34:27,359 --> 00:34:31,109 hopefully quickly 816 00:34:34,950 --> 00:34:33,510 okay let's go to uh back to npr and jeff 817 00:34:38,790 --> 00:34:34,960 broomfield for a follow-up we'll make 818 00:34:44,149 --> 00:34:41,669 sure um as i'm sure dr king and maybe 819 00:34:45,750 --> 00:34:44,159 some others are aware a lot of well not 820 00:34:48,149 --> 00:34:45,760 a lot of people but there are critics of 821 00:34:50,550 --> 00:34:48,159 ams they say that the two billion dollar 822 00:34:53,030 --> 00:34:50,560 price tag isn't really um 823 00:34:55,750 --> 00:34:53,040 worth you know the result we're seeing 824 00:34:57,349 --> 00:34:55,760 today which is non-definitive detection 825 00:34:59,109 --> 00:34:57,359 of dark matter i'd just like to give you 826 00:35:04,470 --> 00:34:59,119 guys an opportunity to respond to that 827 00:35:04,480 --> 00:35:06,950 well 828 00:35:11,270 --> 00:35:08,069 this 829 00:35:12,630 --> 00:35:11,280 is the beginning 830 00:35:15,589 --> 00:35:12,640 of our 831 00:35:19,750 --> 00:35:17,750 physical review letters 832 00:35:22,230 --> 00:35:19,760 today inform me 833 00:35:23,430 --> 00:35:22,240 they will put all data on the front 834 00:35:25,589 --> 00:35:23,440 cover 835 00:35:27,109 --> 00:35:25,599 and also 836 00:35:28,870 --> 00:35:27,119 announce us 837 00:35:31,910 --> 00:35:28,880 to be 838 00:35:39,030 --> 00:35:35,829 editor's choice and view viewpoint so 839 00:35:40,390 --> 00:35:39,040 every different person is entitled to 840 00:35:43,670 --> 00:35:40,400 their opinion 841 00:35:45,510 --> 00:35:43,680 but the important thing is 842 00:35:47,910 --> 00:35:45,520 ams is there now 843 00:35:49,670 --> 00:35:47,920 we are collecting data 844 00:35:52,550 --> 00:35:49,680 we will be collecting data for the 845 00:35:56,550 --> 00:35:52,560 lifetime of the space station 846 00:36:01,109 --> 00:35:59,109 accuracy and with its 847 00:36:03,589 --> 00:36:01,119 sensitivity 848 00:36:05,030 --> 00:36:03,599 we will explore 849 00:36:09,670 --> 00:36:05,040 a region 850 00:36:14,230 --> 00:36:10,870 anything to add 851 00:36:17,190 --> 00:36:14,240 yeah um i i'd like to add that the cost 852 00:36:19,030 --> 00:36:17,200 of the space station is um is born not 853 00:36:22,069 --> 00:36:19,040 only by the united states but many 854 00:36:24,950 --> 00:36:22,079 international uh collaborators uh 15 855 00:36:28,630 --> 00:36:24,960 other nations contribute to the cost of 856 00:36:32,550 --> 00:36:28,640 the of the ams excuse me um 857 00:36:33,910 --> 00:36:32,560 the u.s contribution uh for ams is 858 00:36:37,670 --> 00:36:33,920 comparable 859 00:36:39,589 --> 00:36:37,680 to the costs that we bear for other dark 860 00:36:40,710 --> 00:36:39,599 matter experiments 861 00:36:44,470 --> 00:36:40,720 so 862 00:36:46,710 --> 00:36:44,480 our program at doe is balanced between 863 00:36:49,670 --> 00:36:46,720 these three different ways of searching 864 00:36:54,790 --> 00:36:49,680 for dark matter with comparable expenses 865 00:36:59,030 --> 00:36:56,550 great let's take one last question by 866 00:37:01,750 --> 00:36:59,040 phone from ken cramer of universe today 867 00:37:05,829 --> 00:37:04,470 hi thanks for taking my question um for 868 00:37:07,750 --> 00:37:05,839 professor ting 869 00:37:09,990 --> 00:37:07,760 there are different detectors on the ams 870 00:37:13,270 --> 00:37:10,000 i wonder if any of the detectors were 871 00:37:15,589 --> 00:37:13,280 more helpful than others in gathering 872 00:37:18,470 --> 00:37:15,599 the data or or were they all equally 873 00:37:24,069 --> 00:37:20,630 this is a very good question 874 00:37:26,230 --> 00:37:24,079 we have many detectors 875 00:37:28,470 --> 00:37:26,240 we have 876 00:37:31,589 --> 00:37:28,480 designed these detectors 877 00:37:34,230 --> 00:37:31,599 to be complementary to each other 878 00:37:37,589 --> 00:37:34,240 and so that every signal we see is 879 00:37:39,750 --> 00:37:37,599 verified by a different detector in this 880 00:37:41,349 --> 00:37:39,760 way what dual 881 00:37:46,630 --> 00:37:41,359 of uh 882 00:37:51,349 --> 00:37:48,790 okay so we will take a one last question 883 00:37:53,510 --> 00:37:51,359 here in the audience for miriam go ahead 884 00:37:56,550 --> 00:37:53,520 hi thanks uh miriam with space.com again 885 00:37:58,870 --> 00:37:56,560 um i'm just wondering uh how the ams 886 00:38:01,990 --> 00:37:58,880 data compares to what it was predicted 887 00:38:04,150 --> 00:38:02,000 to uh to find when it was designed um 888 00:38:05,990 --> 00:38:04,160 and is the instrument sort of fulfilling 889 00:38:09,589 --> 00:38:06,000 the goals that uh 890 00:38:15,510 --> 00:38:12,710 i couldn't hear the question i'm sorry 891 00:38:16,870 --> 00:38:15,520 um could you repeat it 892 00:38:18,790 --> 00:38:16,880 hi um 893 00:38:21,990 --> 00:38:18,800 i'm just wondering how the ams data 894 00:38:24,550 --> 00:38:22,000 compares to what was predicted um or if 895 00:38:26,150 --> 00:38:24,560 if this was sort of out of the blue um 896 00:38:27,670 --> 00:38:26,160 and uh 897 00:38:30,630 --> 00:38:27,680 is the instrument sort of fulfilling the 898 00:38:33,829 --> 00:38:30,640 goals uh that you would hoped for when 899 00:38:36,950 --> 00:38:33,839 it was designed initially 900 00:38:42,870 --> 00:38:40,390 when we first designed the detector 901 00:38:45,349 --> 00:38:42,880 we have hoped 902 00:38:47,030 --> 00:38:45,359 to have a sensitivity of one percent 903 00:38:48,950 --> 00:38:47,040 accuracy 904 00:38:51,670 --> 00:38:48,960 and to have a very good 905 00:38:52,710 --> 00:38:51,680 resolution 906 00:38:55,190 --> 00:38:52,720 and 907 00:38:58,470 --> 00:38:55,200 we are very happy 908 00:39:01,510 --> 00:38:58,480 we managed to achieve this goal as i 909 00:39:05,270 --> 00:39:01,520 mentioned at the beginning 910 00:39:09,349 --> 00:39:07,750 it's normally not reached 911 00:39:11,990 --> 00:39:09,359 in accelerators 912 00:39:15,030 --> 00:39:12,000 detectors on the ground to do this in 913 00:39:17,430 --> 00:39:15,040 space really it's a very challenging 914 00:39:18,390 --> 00:39:17,440 thing so we are very happy 915 00:39:22,550 --> 00:39:18,400 we have 916 00:39:27,109 --> 00:39:24,550 great any any final thoughts from here 917 00:39:28,790 --> 00:39:27,119 in washington 918 00:39:30,150 --> 00:39:28,800 good okay well that's gonna end today's 919 00:39:31,910 --> 00:39:30,160 media conference then you can find out 920 00:39:33,109 --> 00:39:31,920 more information about ams and the 921 00:39:35,030 --> 00:39:33,119 international space station at 922 00:39:36,550 --> 00:39:35,040 www.nasa.gov 923 00:39:39,230 --> 00:39:36,560 station you can find all the ways to 924 00:39:42,069 --> 00:39:39,240 connect with us on social media at 925 00:39:44,069 --> 00:39:42,079 www.nasa.gov connect i'd like to thank 926 00:39:45,990 --> 00:39:44,079 all of our speakers for joining us today